Pursuing Peace- Creating a Framework for
Engagement
"Depart from evil and do
good, seek peace and pursue it" (Psalms 34:15)
My
rabbi began his High Holiday speech by saying, "This has been a very difficult summer for
most of us." Of course, he was talking about Israel. He talked about what it
was like to live under the tension of rockets. We all remember when major
airlines refused to fly to Tel Aviv. We also saw the incredible instability of
the Middle East- Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq. I was in Paris in July this summer when
the anti-Israel demonstrations were going on. I saw police cars parked in front
of synagogues. In every bistro in Paris the TV sets were showing pictures of
Gaza. I walked by signs that explained that this was a corner where Jewish
children had been gathered up for transport. I felt their vulnerability. It
felt vulnerable again.
For
those of us that make a hobby of following the politics of the region it is
extraordinarily difficult to keep up with the complex weave of events. In
Israel, these are not just intellectual
issues- they are existential issues. Many people want to pressure Israel to
take a leap for peace because they think that the leap could make things better
or make things right. While a
Palestinian state on the West Bank might provide a breakthrough that allows
Israel to gain real sustainable peace this risky leap could put a Hamas
oriented regime 10 miles from major population centers.
 |
| Tal Becker |
Recently
I heard a presentation from Israel peace negotiator, Dr. Tal Becker. Becker is
a senior policy advisor
to Israel's Minister of Foreign Affairs and was a lead negotiator in the
Annapolis peace talks. He described three main possible paths going forward: "Meltdown, Muddle
Through and Miracle." Becker said that 80% of Israelis still hope for a two
state solution. At the same time most Israelis don’t believe a miracle is
possible. So this summer rockets flared. Children had nightmares of terrorist
coming out of the ground to snatch them. Although parents try to comfort their
children, when they talked with their friends they were uneasy. They saw no miracle
path to comfort-just ongoing tension as they muddle through and hope to avoid a
meltdown.
My
rabbi noted that many of his colleagues had chosen not to speak about Israel
for the High Holidays. They were uncomfortable. It was just too divisive. He
disclosed that he had lost some members who felt he had not been strident
enough in supporting Israel. A few had quit because he had not condemned Israel
enough for the war in Gaza. In my work I see more rabbis choosing to avoid this
topic. While the connection to Israel is a core pillar of Conservative Judaism,
many rabbis have chosen to flee the topic.
My
rabbi decided, despite the risks, that it would be "rabbinic malpractice" not
to speak about Israel during these High Holiday. He also announced a series of
programs about Israel to continue the conversation. As I listened to his High
Holiday sermon I became uncomfortable. I am a co-chair of the Israel Zionist
Book Group at the synagogue. It was time to pick a book. I read several books
this summer. Each expanded my knowledge but they were too polarizing. I stand
in the middle of most of these debates. I pride myself in wanting to understand
both sides of an issue. With passions high, I just did not want to make a
choice. In the end, I decided it would be Zionist malpractice not to
pick a book. We are meeting November 3 to read Turning David into Goliath.
Tal
Becker noted that Israelis audiences have become used to living with unresolved
issues. In contrast he noted he has found that American audiences always wanted
to be left with some hope. While his analysis was not particularly hopeful, his
stance provided me with some hope. He talked about how important it was to
listen and empathize with the other parties' story and not to shout over it. It
does not pay to ask Palestinians to "get over" their sense of loss from the
events of 1948 anymore than it is reasonable to ask Israelis to forget 3000
years of persecution or the Holocaust. He said the effective diplomat needs to
imagine how he would write his adversaries' "victory speech." Negotiators need
to be able to see how their plan might provide a plausible path for the other
side to accept a settlement.
I encourage leaders have to balance their
stance of advocacy (winning the case) and inquiry (learning about the
situation).In practice, I lean to the pole of inquiry, or as Steven Covey argues, to "seek first to understand before being understood."
Becker noted that the Torah challenges us to "seek" peace, not to "achieve" peace. We are all challenged to be seekers of
peace, even if - and when - the issues around the achievement of peace may be out of our
control.
Peace,
Becker argued, came when boundaries and resources were negotiated. The
agreements were not made by people who loved or trusted each other. The peace
accords created a structure that allowed the better actors in both communities
to evolve. By taking a balanced stance for engaging Israel, my rabbi created a
structure where members could stay engaged, continue to learn, and maintain
some hope. He encouraged me to seize the opportunity to step up and engage my
book group. That was an action within my control.
